I tried a politically inflammatory question about factually provable recent events (European reactions to Ukrainian military targeting of Russian oil export infrastructure) and the results were too heavily weighted towards content by under-30s to be useful. For something like brand marketing analytics however the results seem good.
Not sure why Bluesky isn't included in the metasearches, the active part of the userbase is as large as the active part of Threads' userbase.
At least a third of military intel officers are under 30, why are you want to discount them?
Because they're missing twenty years of context.
The average age of Congress vs. Congressional approval rating would like a word
[flagged]
I tried a politically inflammatory question about factually provable recent events (European reactions to Ukrainian military targeting of Russian oil export infrastructure) and the results were too heavily weighted towards content by under-30s to be useful. For something like brand marketing analytics however the results seem good.
Not sure why Bluesky isn't included in the metasearches, the active part of the userbase is as large as the active part of Threads' userbase.
At least a third of military intel officers are under 30, why are you want to discount them?
Because they're missing twenty years of context.
The average age of Congress vs. Congressional approval rating would like a word
They can have several
[dead]