> Artificial intelligence will displace so many jobs that it will eliminate the need for mass immigration, according to Palantir Technologies Inc. Chief Executive Officer Alex Karp.
>“There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training,” said Karp, speaking at a World Economic Forum panel in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday. “I do think these trends really do make it hard to imagine why we should have large-scale immigration unless you have a very specialized skill.”
Idk man, that sounds like a crock of nonsense. Previous waves of automation sure didn’t stop the demand for immigrant labor - if anything, it’s only increased.
>> “There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training,”
I was with him until "vocational training", he's obviously implying that the bots will be bosses and the humans - Indians. That message is being thrown around way too often to exclude the possibility of a planned development.
> Previous waves of automation sure didn’t stop the demand for immigrant labor - if anything, it’s only increased.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, I'd much rather analyze a situation for what it is than rely on rough and unproven analogies.
I'm not sure what "waves of automation" you have in mind but for example, automation in the auto industry did lead to a drastic reduction of workforce per car produced, just look at the former auto factories in Detroit. So the Palantir guy is kind of right here.
The real issue is who will control the AI, because in addition to being a workforce reducer it can serve as a rather petty oppressor. The reduction of immigration is the least of your worries here.
Really curious how it's going to kill the need for immigrants in construction, agriculture, food service, hospitality, lawn care, cleaning, building maintenance, etc.
Maybe the idea is all us displaced software folks end up in the fields picking fruit?
It’s also interesting because the whole SV model assumes demand which goes way down if a genuine AI enters the market and starts cutting into middle class jobs. There aren’t many ads targeting low-wage workers, not nearly enough to support the tech sector.
There is a reason why you are seeing a ton of humanoid robots in development. They just don't have the software to make them viable yet.
> Maybe the idea is all us displaced software folks end up in the fields picking fruit?
Apparently, that's exactly the main idea here. Them and other expendable office workers.
[dead]
character: l (displayed as l) (codepoint 108, #o154, #x6c)
LATIN SMALL LETTER L
Why did you replace the "I" in "AI" with its homoglyph "l"?[deleted]
> Artificial intelligence will displace so many jobs that it will eliminate the need for mass immigration, according to Palantir Technologies Inc. Chief Executive Officer Alex Karp.
>“There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training,” said Karp, speaking at a World Economic Forum panel in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday. “I do think these trends really do make it hard to imagine why we should have large-scale immigration unless you have a very specialized skill.”
Idk man, that sounds like a crock of nonsense. Previous waves of automation sure didn’t stop the demand for immigrant labor - if anything, it’s only increased.
>> “There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training,”
I was with him until "vocational training", he's obviously implying that the bots will be bosses and the humans - Indians. That message is being thrown around way too often to exclude the possibility of a planned development.
> Previous waves of automation sure didn’t stop the demand for immigrant labor - if anything, it’s only increased.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, I'd much rather analyze a situation for what it is than rely on rough and unproven analogies.
I'm not sure what "waves of automation" you have in mind but for example, automation in the auto industry did lead to a drastic reduction of workforce per car produced, just look at the former auto factories in Detroit. So the Palantir guy is kind of right here.
The real issue is who will control the AI, because in addition to being a workforce reducer it can serve as a rather petty oppressor. The reduction of immigration is the least of your worries here.
Really curious how it's going to kill the need for immigrants in construction, agriculture, food service, hospitality, lawn care, cleaning, building maintenance, etc.
Maybe the idea is all us displaced software folks end up in the fields picking fruit?
It’s also interesting because the whole SV model assumes demand which goes way down if a genuine AI enters the market and starts cutting into middle class jobs. There aren’t many ads targeting low-wage workers, not nearly enough to support the tech sector.
There is a reason why you are seeing a ton of humanoid robots in development. They just don't have the software to make them viable yet.
> Maybe the idea is all us displaced software folks end up in the fields picking fruit?
Apparently, that's exactly the main idea here. Them and other expendable office workers.
[dead]
https://archive.is/N0Jz5
Looks like he lost a fight with a Van de Graaff